![]() “To me, ChatGPT is the research equivalent of Grammarly. It’s like saying using the internet to conduct research is unethical,” Gelman says. ![]() “Calling the use of ChatGPT to pull reliable sources from the internet ‘cheating’ is absurd. There are those, like Cobbs, who can’t imagine putting their name on anything bot-generated, but there are others who see it as just another tool, like spellcheck or even a calculator. For Brown University sophomore Jacob Gelman, ChatGPT exists merely as a convenient research assistant and nothing more. Students’ views on ChatGPT are another issue entirely. I suspect the definition of plagiarism will expand to include things that produce.”Įventually, Dailey believes, a student who uses text from ChatGPT will be seen as no different than one that copies and pastes chunks of text from Wikipedia without attribution. “Students who commit plagiarism often borrow material from a ‘somewhere’-a website, for example, that doesn’t have clear authorial attribution. ![]() “I think we’ve been in a version of this territory for a while already,” Dailey says. Although Dailey acknowledges that this technological growth incites new concerns in the world of academia, she doesn’t find it to be a realm entirely unexplored.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |